RaFaL asked: > So OK, tell me if I get it right, and how (and why) it will look in Perl > 6. From Exegesis I see that NaN==NaN, but that's not stated in > Apocalypse (or I just missed it).
No, it's not stated there. But I hope that Perl 6 will follow the lead of other high level languages and reject the non-identity of NaN. > BTW, I really like the direction of Perl 6 development, all of you are > doing really great job here. I was very surprised when I saw the > negative feedback on Slashdot, and I thought that if my enthusiasm is so > abnormal, than maybe it's a sign that I should join your team. :) > Really, I'd love to help with Perl 6 development if I can be useful > somehow. You're already doing it. Rather than more cooks, we need more food critics: as many people as possible working through the ramifications and inconsistencies of the design. Damian
