Jonathan Scott Duff # On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:17:26AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: # > Depending on what Larry's planning, we may weld in support # for imaginary # > numbers. While they're mind-warping, in some ways they're # better than # > having a line labeled "Beyond here be dragons" or something. # # Neat. It'd be nice to have the "i" syntax as well: 3+2i # # I can hear the crys now though "Oh no! First ``x'', then ``v'', now # ``_'' and ``i''. Sheesh! When will it end?!?" ;-)
For consistency, I'd prefer to use is: 3+(2 is i). Well, either way, this is a good thing for properties to handle. GO PROPERTIES! ;^) --Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configure pumpking for Perl 6 They *will* pay for what they've done.
