On 09 Oct 2001 11:22:02 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>Does the change from ?: to ??:: mean that we can have '?' as a valid
>character in an identifier?
I'm sure it won't be. The reasoning for replacing "?" with "??" is that
"?" is worth too much as a single character symbol, to sacrifice it on
such a rather lowly used operator. And now you want to reclaim it... for
no operator at all? That, I'm sure, is going into the entirely wrong
direction.
As in Lisp, you can use "p".
sub is_visiblep { ... }
;-)
--
Bart.
