Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 2:33 PM +0100 4/7/02, Piers Cawley wrote:
>>"Jonathan E. Paton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> but wait, there's more... what does:
>>>
>>> @multi_dim[$a][$b][$c]
>>>
>>> give?
>>
>>Who cares? So long as the intermediate results in
>>@multi_dim.[$a].[$b].[$c] respond to [].
>
> Hrm. Will they need to? That could arguably pass a three element key
> ($a,$b,$c) to @multi_dim which, conveniently being a three-dimensional
> array, returns a value itself.
Oh ghod. I'm getting confused now.
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
