On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:57:01PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > > ::m2; # calls global subroutine main::m2 > > main::m2; # calls global subroutine main::m2 > > This is looking more and more horrible Glenn. I think we need to back off of unmarked subroutines becoming a method call. That one extra '.' in front isn't too much, is it?
I like the following, assumed to be within method m1: ..m2(); # call m2 the same way m1 was called, instance or class $_.m2(); # same thing? Does the class become the topic in a static method? ..class.m2: # call static m2 within m1's class, regardless of how m1 was called m2() # call subroutine m2 with no arguments, implied or otherwise -- Mark J. REED <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
