At 2:26 PM +0100 4/26/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:25:15PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: >> At 12:36 PM -0400 4/23/02, Buddha Buck wrote: >> >OK, but that limits you to the, um, 24 standard levels of >> >precedence. What do you do if you don't think that that's enough >> >> Internally precedence is going to be stored as a floating-point >> number. Dunno how it'll be exposed at the language level, but at >> least there'll be more than just 20 or so levels. > >Why store precedence as floating point rather than integer? >[Or did I miss a design document}
Because, while you may run into problems fitting something in between 1.0000001 and 1.0000002, it's not a problem to fit something between 3 and 4. Floating point precedence is a problem at the edge, but integer precedence makes things potentially difficult for user-added operators if you want to fit things between the standard operators. -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk