ralph wrote:
> I'm basically sold on Damian's conclusions. On the other
> hand the 'otherwise' clause still feels to me like a CAPITALS
> block.
>
> So, as a tweak, I suggest:
>
> while condition() {
> ...
> }
> NONE {
> ...
> }
Would you also change C<else> to C<ELSE>? I think lowercase is more
appropriate because C<otherwise> would be a control structure, rather
than an event handler.
Making it a CAPITAL block is also a little inconsistent: the other CAPITAL
blocks attach behaviour to the *surrounding* block, not the *preceding* one.
Damian
