Aaron Sherman wrote: > So, for example here are some translations of existing operators: > > + <={.count > 0}> > * <={1}> > *? <={1}>? > <8> <={.count == 8}> # No optimization possible!
Could it be done this way?: @c:=(.)* <( @c == 8 )> Surely inefficient, but it works right (I think). Would there be a more efficient way to do it within the existing system? It's easy to do non-greedy, too. Just slap a question mark on the end of that star. Luke