[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> sub hidden (str $name, int $force, int $override is aka($force))
>> { ... }
>
>
> Would the following be simpler...?
>
> sub hidden (str $name, int $force is aka($override))
> { ... }
Yeah, that's what I meant.
Sorry. I've travelled 14,000 miles and given 93 hours of
presentations in the last 18 days. [Note to self: no more
posting whilst semi-conscious!!!]
%-)
> BTW, the aka thing is cool. It could be complementary to "is named":
>
> # can't use force_tainted as argument:
> sub hidden (int $force_tainted is named($force))
>
> # can use force_tainted as argument:
> sub hidden (int $force_tainted is aka($force))
Yes, that was the idea. :-)
Damian
