On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:02:02PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> : On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 04:11 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
> : > has Nose $.snout;
> : > has Ear @.ears is cut("long");
> : > has Leg @.legs;
> : > has Tail $.tail is cut("short");
> : >
> : > method Wag () {...}
> : > }
I like "has" quite a bit.
> :
> : What's the rationale again for the dot in $.snout? Does it imply that
> : it should be
> :
> : method .Wag () {...}
> :
> : to match?
>
> Yes, that's part of it, presuming you actually meant:
>
> method .snout () {...}
Actually, I think he meant
method &.Wag () { ... }
"Attribute declarations have their dots, why not methods?" or
something to that effect.
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
