On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:55:24AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> Well, I don't believe in "none" since it's really easy to say !any(), but
> exclusive-or can certainly use the punctuation. Or, actually, I'm currently
> thinking, non-punctuation. I kept thinking to myself that it's a shame
> that x is already taken, and then I looked crosseyed at the // vs \\
> proposals, and I realized we have a superposition of / and \ that is
> spelled "X". :-)
Hmm. I wonder if people aren't going to expect some relationship
between x and X ..
> So at the moment I'm thinking we have
>
> $a X $b # super xor
> $a XX $b # logical high precedence xor
> $a X= $b # assignment xor
> $a +X $b # intbits xor
> $a ~X $b # strbits xor
> $a ^XX $b # hyper xor
> $a xor $b # low precedence xor
> +X $a # int complement
> ~X $a # str complement
And presumably these as well?
$a ^X= $b # hyper assignment xor
$a ^+X $b # hyper intbits xor
$a ^~X $b # hyper strbits xor
$a ^xor $b # hyper low precedence xor
^+X $a # hyper int complement
^~X $a # hyper str complement
Sometimes when I look at stuff like this I start to Cozenify and ask
myself "what language is this again?"
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
