Larry Wall writes:
>
> So despite the beauty of
>
> @a [+] @b
>
> I think it cannot survive in its current form. It overloads square
> brackets too heavily.
>
> Larry
>
so may be @a <+> @b
@a < => > @b
@a < , > @b
@a < .= > replace ( /<foo>/ -> { "bar" } )
but
@c = @a < <=> > @b
this work since we do not have unary > or < and parser
will be able to distinguish . also , sinse <...> readline is term , it
does not interfere with <op> . am I right ?
to me <op> is visually more distinctive and less heavy then [op] .
but now it visually interfere with <iterator> and <regexp> .
arcadi .
