Larry Wall writes:
>
> sub postfix:! (num $x) { $x < 2 ?? $x :: $x * ($x - 1) ! }
>
> which could be fixed with the _:
>
> sub postfix:! (num $x) { $x < 2 ?? $x :: $x * ($x - 1) _! }
>
> Weird, but it's all consistent with the distinction we're already
> making on curlies, which gave a great increase in readability.
>
does it mean that *all* postfix operators have to be "attached"
without space to their operand or used with space eater modifyer
or
only those for which parser ( or we ) knows that they may be confused
with binary op or term ?
probably the same question for prefix operators .
aracdi
