> From: "Ph. Marek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:10:19 +0100 > > So an usage could be > @a = @b =>+ @b; > @a = @b =+> @b; > @a = @b +=> @b; > where the 2nd form would be the most intuitive (from reading this source). > Hmm, that would leave us with > @a =+>= @b; > which ain't as pretty.
Well, none of them are very pretty. Also, things like =>=> =<=> =<> would come up, as hyper-relation operators, showing their impossible-to-read-ness. The last one is also ambiguous. Right now we're thinking ≫op≪, if you haven't heard (that is, >>op<<) (not that ≫>=≪ is particularly easy to read ;). Additionally, I wouldn't bother suggesting anything else, as in the operator thread just about aleph-null possibilities were suggested, so it would be tough to come up with a new one. Thanks, though. Luke
