Nicholas Clark wrote: > I'm not sure. I think I like the idea of > > @a[0] = undef; > > being a blip, but > > undef @a[0]; > > resetting the value to the default.
That thought crossed my mind as well before I got to your message ... > Conceptually perl5 already has a distinction between assigning undef > to an aggregate, and passing an aggregate to the undef operator: ... however I'm unconvinced that that's the sort of distinction that should be encouraged. Smylers
