To take the E6 example of currying &part: &List::Part::part.assuming(labels => <<sheep goats>>)
One had to curry in C<labels> to be the same as it was defined in C<&part> originally, i.e. C<< <<sheep goats>> >>. What if one wanted to curry in whatever the default is, i.e., assuming "nothing" (different from "assuming nothing"), so that if List::Part::part changed its default for C<labels> to C<< <<oves caperes>> >>, the client code would pick that up? -- Trey Harris Vice President SAGE -- The System Administrators Guild (www.sage.org) Opinions above are not necessarily those of SAGE.
