Adam Turoff wrote:
> Damian Conway wrote:
>
> > Perhaps this is yet another argument for insisting on:
> >
> > while do {$n++; $foo > $bar}
> >
> > instead.
>
> That looks like syntactic sugar for
>
> while (do) {$n++; $foo > $bar}
do is not merely prototyped, but a builtin. With a mandatory {} arg, why
wouldn't it be greedy?
On the other hand, ()-less conditionals are giving me heebie-jeebies
very distinctly reminiscent of Perl 5's indirect object method
invocation syntax.
--
Gordon Henriksen
IT Manager
ICLUBcentral Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
