Luke Palmer writes:
> Uri Guttman writes:
>
> > >>>>> "DC" == Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > DC> @sorted = sort {-M}=>{$^b cmp $^a} @unsorted;
> >
> > but there is no comma before @unsorted. is that correct?
>
> Yes. Commas may be ommitted on either side of a block when used as an
> argument.
That's what I thought too. But Damian gave exactly the opposite answer
to Uri's question, claiming he'd made a typo and a comma would be
required.
So which is it -- is Luke right in saying that Damian was right in the
first place? Or is Damian right in saying that his example was wrong?
Smylers
