On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:40:50PM +0200, arcadi shehter wrote: : How about <- which is not overloaded by boolean connotations : and is sort of ? turned by 90 degrees .
Don't think so. It's too ambiguous with current meanings. : $topic<- (.a + .b + .c) That asks if $topic is numerically less than the negated return value of the sum of ($_.a + $_.b + $_.c). : my dog $spot<- = .new That's currently a syntax error. : @array<- .[.min .. .max] That asks if the length of @array is less than the negated value of $_[$_.min .. $_.max]. Larry
