Luke Palmer writes:
> <{ get_rule() }> # call an anonymous rule returned by the code block
>
> Can also be written:
>
> <$( get_rule() )>
>
> Therefore, the first syntax can be redefined to evaluate the code block
> and assign the result to $0. The example now becomes:
>
> rule list {
> <?term> , <?list> <{ make_node('list', $?term, $?list) }>
> | <?term> <{ $?term }>
> }
>
> My argument for using this notation stems from the fact that it would
> be a royal pain to write subs like:
>
> sub add ($a, $b) {
> $RET = $a + $b;
> }
This sounds sensible to me -- not something I'd normally bother saying
(a surprisingly high number of the mails on this list sound sensible to
me), but I thought this could do with some deWarnockization ...
Smylers
