>>>>> "AS" == Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AS> Matthew Walton wrote: >> Larry Wall wrote: >> >>> I suspect there's an argument that [0,0) ought to be considered undef >>> (which would conveniently numerify to 0 with an optional warning). >> >> In the absence of a paradox value, undef would be fine there I think :-) AS> Too bad we don't have NaRN (Not a Random Number)... that's in the IEEE AS> spec, isn't it? ;-) no, narns are in the babylon 5 bible! :) uri -- Uri Guttman ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------- http://www.stemsystems.com --Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding- Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
