Richard Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Conflict with "last LOOP"? Hm, the context should be enough to
>> distinguish them, no? (Hey, maybe they can be unified somehow --
>> "last -1" to skip to the penultimate pass through the loop? =P)
>
> That could be generalised, "next +1" skipping next iteration, "next
> -1" "redo" this iteration, "first" redo the iteration from the
> beginning etc.
Ah, so then we could do stuff like this:
for (10 .. 1000 :by(10)) {
given { # I imagine the topic will be picked up here automagically.
when 10 { do_something(); }
when 20 { do_something_else(); }
...
}
next +(10 * (int rand(100) - 50))
}
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be used for evil :-)
--
$;=sub{$/};@;=map{my($a,$b)=($_,$;);$;=sub{$a.$b->()}}
split//,"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ --";$\=$ ;-> ();print$/
