Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:

I like this in general.  However...

Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


* Since we already stole angles from iterators, «$fh» is not
how you make iterators iterate. Instead we use $fh.fetch (or
whatever) in scalar context, and $fh.fetch or @$fh or $fh[]
or *$fh in list context.



I believe you tried this one a couple years ago, and people freaked
out. As an alternative, could we get a different operator for this? I propose one of:


   $fh ->
   $fh» (and $fh>>)
   $fh>

All three have connotations of "the next thing".  The first one might
interfere with pointy subs, though, and the last two would be
whitespace-sensitive.  (But it looks like that isn't a bad thing
anymore...)

Any other suggestions, people?



++$fh





Reply via email to