On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:33:25PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > With the note that "b" must be evaluated at most once. However, if > taken literally, it gives this rather weird result: > > pugs> ? 2 < (0 | 3) < 4 > (#t|#t)
Surely you can do better than that for counterintuitive? :-) 4 < (0 | 6) < 2 > My intuition is that it should be equivalent to this: > > pugs> ? (2 < 0 < 4) | (2 < 3 < 4) > (#f|#t) Which I think would change (#t|#t) to (#f|#f) in my example. Nicholas Clark
