Luke Palmer wrote: > I don't think it's a good idea to make a new low precedence assignment. > Let's say we made it <-. Does that imply that there is also > low-precedence binding :<- and compile-time binding ::<- ? Those don't > look right. I think we're weighing making good ol' assignment low
surely they could be
<:- and <::-
those look a lot nicer :)
> precedence vs. having parentheses on 'my'.
>
> Luke
TTFN, Struan
