Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Besides, I think "as" will do just fine, especially since you can now
> interpolate method calls as well. You can even do something like this
> if you want to perform bulk formatting:
>
> say join ' ', ($n1, $n2, $n3) >>.as('%d');
What about:
say [ $n1, $n2, $n3 >>.as('%d') ].join;
?
Can I (1) use join on a bracketed list and (2) leave off the
parentheses around C<$n1, $n2, $n3>? (I couldn't find where hyper ops
are on the precedence table.)
> Or, if that's not quite sufficient:
>
> say map { .key.as(.value) }
> $num => '%d',
> $str => '%s',
> ...;
And this:
say [ $num => '%d', $str => '%s' ] >>.key.as(.value);
?
Can I (3) hyper-op chained method calls and (4) use square brackets in
this instance (to make sure my list doesn't form a parameter list to
C<say>)?
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
