On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:24:16AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:46:03PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > : Is using wrap/call the correct choice here, or is there another way > : to do it that I missed? > > wrap/call should do what you want there, but if you want to hack in > &func.goto, that'd be good too.
Done as r804. It also passes the expected context ("want") of its original caller to &func, which I assume is the correct behaviour. Thanks, /Autrijus/
Description: PGP signature