On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:24:16AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:46:03PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> : Is using wrap/call the correct choice here, or is there another way
> : to do it that I missed?
> wrap/call should do what you want there, but if you want to hack in
> &func.goto, that'd be good too.

Done as r804.  It also passes the expected context ("want") of its
original caller to &func, which I assume is the correct behaviour.


Attachment: pgpBo6lHOX0Pe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to