Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-16 12:17 (-0800):
> for @foo {...}
> is actually short for:
> for @foo -> $_ is rw {...}
Has there been any decision on <-> yet? If <-> is there, it's much
easier to say that without arguments, <-> $_ is used. That way, there is
no surprising magic "is rw", but just another operator (that happens to
be the exact same thing in practice).
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
