Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-16 12:17 (-0800):
>       for @foo {...}
>     is actually short for:
>       for @foo -> $_ is rw {...}

Has there been any decision on <-> yet? If <-> is there, it's much
easier to say that without arguments, <-> $_ is used. That way, there is
no surprising magic "is rw", but just another operator (that happens to
be the exact same thing in practice).


Reply via email to