On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:54:15PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> in the same form if it does come back. So consider 6.0 its usage
> deprecation cycle, so we can redefine its meaning (if we decide to).
I don't see why study needs a deprecation cycle when length doesn't get one.
It seems fair game to me that (some) things can change disjointly in Perl 6
(providing that not too many things change such that the language is no
longer perl. Which I don't think is happening, and if you do think it's
happening, there's still always going to be perl 5 for you to use)
Also it sounds like study fits much better as a method on a scalar, rather
than a function in *::