--- Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
. . .
> <-[a..z]>
>
> should be allowed/encouraged/required. It greatly improves the
> readability in my estimation. The only problem with requiring .. is
> that people *will* write <[a-z]> out of habit, and we would probably
> have to outlaw the - form for many years before everyone would get
> used to the .. form. So maybe we allow - but warn if not
> backslashed.
In general, I think this is a great idea, but what exactly do you mean
by "warn if not backslashed"? That I'd get a warning *any* time I use a
dash in a character class? I guess I can live with that.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide