> No, S03 is probably just wrong there. Junctions are scalar values, and
> don't flatten in list context. Maybe we need something like:
>
> for =all(@foo) {...}
>
> to iterate the junction.
for all(1,2,3).values { say $_; }
reads nicely and works in pugs.
Also, flattening may get messy with nested junctions.
> for any(1,2,3) {...}
>
> then it would have done the "next", because 1 < 2.
Confused myself there. Thanks.
> =none(1,2,3) should return a list of all the things that aren't 1, 2,
> or 3 in random order. Maybe a lazy implementation will be beneficial
> at that point. :-)
none() outside of boolean context is lazily evaluated by my brain.
My eyes glaze over and I think about something else.
Brad
--
When one is not capable of true intelligence, it is good to consult with
someone of good sense. -- Hagakure http://bereft.net/hagakure/
