On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:59:19AM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: : I like the idea that $.foo ALWAYS means the $.foo in the current class. : Anything else gets very ugly later on.
Well, since I'm not going with & for "self", I'm probably not going with the $.foo meaning anything outside of the class either. : On a side note about auto-accessors, if I say: : : class X { : has $.foo; : } : class Y is X { : has %.foo; : } : : What happens to the accessors for X.foo? Overridden just like any such method. Larry