> What I refer to now is something that takes two {coderefs,anonymous
> subs,closures} and returns (an object that behaves like) another anonymous
> sub, precisely the one that acts like the former followed by the latter
> (or vice versa!).Do you mean like the mathematical 'f o g'? i.e. (f o g)($x) == f(g($x)) Maybe we could just use 'o'. (Too bad we can't use Haskell's 'f . g'...) Stuart
