On 5/6/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the precedence of a reduction operator? > > Pugs currently implements it at the symbolic unary level, like the > filetest operators. But that's just one of many guesses. > > In #perl6, we can't decide what it should be. There are good arguments > for listop precedence ([+] 1..9) and for unary precedence ([EMAIL PROTECTED] < > $bar). My preference is listop precedence.
Good, because that's Larry's preference, too: : I propose that reduce become a metaoperator that can be applied to : any binary operator and turns it syntactically into a list operator. Luke
