> What if you give it a 1-ary sub that you thought was slurpy, and in
> fact does something different (hmm, that doesn't seem very likely). 
> How do we handle options and the like?

.assuming ?  Although map would be simpler, clearer and more flexible.

> Still, semantics like that are dwimmery, and the pipe operators are as
> yet non dwimmy, so we'd be paying a price.  Is that more or less than
> three characters (when the pipe operators are already three
> characters)?
> Also, as you point out below, the semantics are less than obvious for
> subs with arity > 1.  So it would be tough to figure out what IM
> anyway.

I was hoping it was just confusing to me and that the best
interpretation would be clear to other on the list.

It's not so I'm happy to ditch the idea.


People with intelligence will use it to fashion both true and false and will
try to push through whatever they want with their clever reasoning.  This is
injury from intelligence.
  Nothing you do will have effect if you do not use truth. -- Hagakure

Reply via email to