We're discussing the proper semantics of (1)[0] on #perl6. Here's where we're at so far:
1. specialise ()[] to parse as (,)[] 2. scalars are singleton lists, so ()[] naturally 3. make (1)[0] die horribly. We all seem to agree that #3 is least useful and probably wrong. But there's a divide between whether #1 or #2 is the "right" behavior. #2 implies that (1)[0][0][0][0] == 1 #1 means that (1)[0] == 1 and (1)[0][0] is an error FWIW, I'm in favor of #1 What does p6l think? (What does @Larry think?) -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
