On 5/15/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does [EMAIL PROTECTED] know the difference between &postcircumfix:<!@ #> 
> and
> &postcircumfix:<! @#>?

Perhaps it checks how many different variations are actually
defined--if it finds only one, it can DWIM, and if it finds more than
one it can barf with an error message complaining about an "ambiguous
postcircumfix operator" or somesuch. In that case, you may have to
write it out longhand.

If we combine this with Damian's [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED], this should
cover most cases fairly cleanly. If your postcircumfix operators are
that ambiguous, you should probably be writing things out longhand


Reply via email to