Juerd wrote:
An array in scalar context evaluates to a reference to itself.

A hash in scalar context evaluates to a reference to itself.

An array in list context evaluates to a list of its elements.

A hash in list context evaluates to a list of its elements (as pairs).

Array context is a scalar context.

I have understand what you mean and how you---and other p6l'er---
derive [EMAIL PROTECTED] == 1 from @a = [1,2,3]. But allow me to regard this
as slightly inconsistent, asymmetric or some such.

Isn't hash context missing in the list above? How does

%a = ( a => 1, b => 2, c => 3 )  # @a = (1,2,3)

compare with

%b = { a => 1, b => 2, c => 3 }  # @b = [1,2,3]

Does that mean

3 == +%a == +%b
  == +{ a => 1, b => 2, c => c }
  == +( a => 1, b => 2, c => c )

holds and the access of the hash works as expected:

%a<a> == 1 == %b<a>  # and @a[0] == 1, but @b[0][0] == 1

What would actually be the equivalent syntax to @b?
Is it %b<><a> or %%b<a> or even (*%b)<a>?
It will hardly be %b{undef}<a>, though.
--
TSa (Thomas Sandla▀)

Reply via email to