while responding to nothingmuch++'s post "function signatures?", I
thought that it'll be great if Code objects were fully introspectable.

  &foo.statements;             # List of statements
  &foo.statements[0]           # First statement
  &foo.statements[2] = ...;    # Statement modification?

And all objects returned from the introspection methods should stringify
appropriately, so that...
  say ~sub { 42 + $^a };   # prints
  sub ($a) { return 42 + $a; }

Is this going too far?
Is this wanted?
Is it useful?

(At least readonly access would be nice, as allowing writes to
&foo.statements will make compiler optimisations much


Linux, the choice of a GNU | self-reference, n. - See self-reference  
generation on a dual AMD   | 
Athlon!                    | 

Reply via email to