On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 16:37 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote: > On 6/20/05, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Who says AUTOLOAD will always either call a loaded sub or fail? > Uh, what else can it do? It doesn't have to load a sub to return a > code reference. I think: class NullObject { sub AUTOLOAD {} } is better than: class NullObject { sub AUTOLOAD { return sub {} } } Or have I misunderstood the proposal and the purpose of AUTOLOAD? -- c