Darren Duncan wrote:
should not store anything other than this single numerical value
internally (smart caching of conversions aside).
I think we can all either agree with that, or dont-care it. The internal
implementation is an implementation issue (or library). It doesn't need
to be defined by the language. The one important thing is that that
language shouldn't define semantics that require more than this single
value (e.g. we shouldn't associate the epoch with the object).
- Re: Time::Local Dave Whipp