[sorry Luke, I hit "Send" too soon] On 7/27/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is probably a better word than "contains". I was thinking set > > theory when I came up with that one.
What about "derives"? Aankhen
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy Aankhen
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy Ingo Blechschmidt
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy Luke Palmer
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy Michele Dondi
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy Larry Wall
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy Luke Palmer
- Re: Messing with the type heirarchy Dave Whipp
