Yuval Kogman wrote:
Luke said he was going to sleep, so I'll point you to some chat logs instead of letting you wait for his reply:http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2005-08-28,Sun&sel=281#l460
Thanks for that.
Bottom line: the aim is to change the meaning.
I think that's an appalling idea. <<>> is *vastly* more valuable as interpolated word list.
If you *have* to propose manuthreading, go with the previous proposal and use >><< instead. The argument that the angles should point to the operator is spurious. People will associate inward facing >><< with hyperization, regardless of what's being hyperized.
Damian
