Ashley Winters skribis 2005-09-01  0:58 (-0700):
> If list construction is via the &infix:<,> operator, does that mean a
> blasphemous sinner could create &infix:<,=> as a synonym for push?

You could do that even without , being a list constructor.

However, in general, chained operators like comma, junction constructors
and infix zip, don't get an op= variant.

There's something nice in

    $foo = 42;
    $foo |= .bar for @quux;

as an alternative for

    $foo = any 42, @quux>>.bar;



Reply via email to