Ashley Winters skribis 2005-09-01 0:58 (-0700): > If list construction is via the &infix:<,> operator, does that mean a > blasphemous sinner could create &infix:<,=> as a synonym for push?
You could do that even without , being a list constructor. However, in general, chained operators like comma, junction constructors and infix zip, don't get an op= variant. There's something nice in $foo = 42; $foo |= .bar for @quux; as an alternative for $foo = any 42, @quux>>.bar; though Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html