Larry Wall skribis 2005-09-07 8:32 (-0700):
> I think that's a powerful argument even if we don't have an infix:<::>.
> Plus I hate all infix "nor" operators due to my English-speaking bias
> that requires a "neither" on the front. So let's go ahead and make
> it ??!!. (At least this week...)
I was going to object based on !!foo being ! ! foo, but that !! is
spelled ? now, so nevermind.