Juerd wrote:
> I do not see why $ and @ couldn't be both a sigil and an infix
> operator, and the same goes for whatever ASCII equivalent ยข gets.
>
> ^ and | are available for sigil use. (All the closing brackets are too,
> but that would be very confusing because we tend to visually parse those
> in pairs.)
>
> Using the an infix operator's symbol as a sigil is not weird, not wrong,
> not confusing and mostly: not a new idea.
Indeed. Somehow I think this makes some sense:
sub Bool eqv (|T $x, |T $y) { ... }
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
