Juerd wrote:
> I do not see why $ and @ couldn't be both a sigil and an infix
> operator, and the same goes for whatever ASCII equivalent ยข gets.
> 
> ^ and | are available for sigil use. (All the closing brackets are too,
> but that would be very confusing because we tend to visually parse those
> in pairs.)
> 
> Using the an infix operator's symbol as a sigil is not weird, not wrong,
> not confusing and mostly: not a new idea.

Indeed.  Somehow I think this makes some sense:

        sub Bool eqv (|T $x, |T $y) { ... }

Thanks,
/Autrijus/

Reply via email to