Michele Dondi skribis 2005-10-25 17:05 (+0200):
> Now, one that I've sometimes desired is a "two level" $_, i.e. a variable, 
> say, $__ referring to the _second next_ enclosing lexical scope. I am 
> aware that in this vein one may ask a third analogue and so on, but let's 
> face it: $_ already covers 95% of cases, my hypothetical var would cover I 
> guess a remaining 4.5% of cases, and who cares for the rest? E.g.:
> for @vert {
>   put_point $_, $__ for @horiz;
> }

I find $__ confusing, and prefer $OUTER::_, which already exists.


Reply via email to