Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The name is relatively unimportant in the overall scheme of things. > I'm more worried about the fact that it's difficult to partition a > list into multiple lists in one pass without declaring temp arrays.
Didn't the list agree long ago on a `part` builtin? I certainly wrote List::Part based on that discussion... -- Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perl and Parrot hacker
