On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:48:39PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:02:57AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:27:17AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: > : On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:32:17PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: > : > We already have, from A5, \x[0a;0d], so you can supposedly say
: > : > "\x[123a;123b;123c]"
: > :
: > : Hmm, I hadn't caught that particular syntax in A05. AFAIK it's not
: > : in S05, so I should probably add it, or whatever syntax we end up
: > : adopting.
: > Yes.
: Out of curiosity (and so I can update S05 and PGE), what syntax
: are we adopting? Is it semicolon, comma, space, any combination of the
: three, or ...?
S02.pod currently has it as comma.