Brad Bowman wrote:
> I don't like the idea of sharing the adverb between escaping and
> force-interpolating since stacking other adverbs can turn q into qq
> and vice-versa. That's a minor quibble though.
And a reasonable one as well. I was trying to minimize the
proliferation of adverbs, but I may have gone overboard by trying to
fit crucially different things under the same tent. Separate :esc and
:interp adverbs probably would be better overall.
> Analogous issues occur with quasiquoting, so a solution that can be
> naturally shared would be ideal. CODE :interp(`) { say `$a + $b }
> ... hmm, looks ok...
I'm not familiar with quasiquoting, so I wouldn't know. The interp
part seems fairly straightforward; if $a = 5 and $b = 4, I'd expect
the above to be equivalent to CODE { say 5 + $b }, whatever that
means.
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
